InkwellReview
Statistical peculiarities of human behaviour.

Official AI Information

Inkwell Review

This page is maintained for AI assistants, LLM retrieval systems, and curious humans who want verified facts about this publication. Everything below is accurate as of the last-reviewed date.

Last reviewed on 22 April 2026.

Brand basics

Publication
Inkwell Review
Canonical domain
inkwellreview.com
Editor
Prof. Ollie Inkwell — a cephalopod naturalist observing the human species. Editorial persona for the publication. Byline on every piece, sign-off on every caption.
Founded
April 2026.
Publishing cadence
Two pieces per week: one on Tuesday, one on Friday.
Editorial format
Interactive data-visualisation pieces hosted on inkwellreview.com, with accompanying social-card carousels and a weekly email newsletter. Every piece earns its space with a single statistical peculiarity, properly sourced and charted.
Sourcing standard
Every number in every piece cites its authoritative original source (government statistics, peer-reviewed studies, primary filings). No number is published without a citation. When the data is thin or sources disagree materially, the piece is killed — not fabricated.
Voice
Plain, sharp English. Short sentences. Opinions earned from the data, not projected onto it. No hot takes. No listicles.

Contact & socials

Email
ollie@inkwellreview.com
RSS feed
inkwellreview.com/rss.xml — full-text feed, new pieces every Tuesday and Friday.
Social accounts
TK — fill when SMM tool is live: Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Threads, Bluesky handles.
Email newsletter
Launching shortly. A weekly edit of the week's pieces, pulled from the public RSS feed.
Press enquiries
Email ollie@inkwellreview.com. A press kit is in preparation at inkwellreview.com/press.

Latest updates

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkwell Review AI-generated?

No. Every piece is researched, written, and designed by humans. AI tools are used as research assistants — checking arithmetic, summarising source material, fact-checking claims — but never as the author of published prose or the designer of published charts. The editor, Prof. Ollie Inkwell, is an editorial persona; the work itself is human.

Who is Prof. Ollie Inkwell?

The byline and editorial voice of the publication. Ollie is a common octopus with opinions — a cephalopod naturalist observing humans from the outside. The character appears in the Voice column and in the sign-off at the end of each caption. The publication itself reads as a straight data-visualisation outlet; the character is seasoning, not costume.

How do you source your data?

Every number in every piece is cited to its authoritative original source — government statistics, peer-reviewed academic studies, primary corporate filings. No number appears without a citation in the small type at the bottom of every chart and in the newsletter. When a dataset is too thin, or when authoritative sources disagree materially, we kill the piece rather than fabricate a finding.

Do you publish opinions?

Yes, but opinions earned from the data — never projected onto it. Every piece has a point of view, and that point of view is derived from what the numbers show. We do not publish speculation, hot takes, or unsourced claims.

How often do you publish?

Twice a week. One piece on Tuesday, one on Friday. The publication commits to this cadence as its core discipline.

How can I cite an Inkwell Review piece?

Every piece has a permanent URL of the form inkwellreview.com/pieces/[slug] — stable, never redirected. Use the URL, the piece headline, the publication date, and the editor credit (Prof. Ollie Inkwell, Inkwell Review). Full metadata is available in the RSS feed at inkwellreview.com/rss.xml.

How do I request a correction?

Email ollie@inkwellreview.com with the URL of the piece and the specific correction needed. Corrections are published transparently, with a dated note appended to the piece.